Justina

Trade your hot mess for HOTness


All the drama you love, just in the right place. Think of Justina as an argument sorter. Other forums are just a landfill for your thoughts and master clap backs—Justina sorts and organizes them into clarity and consensus.

  • Arguments are "mined" for fundamental logic and basic preferences.
  • Votes give weight to arguments; they're used to drive decisions, democratically.
  • Comments are used to collaborate on and refine ideas until an optimal combination of effectiveness and agreement is discovered.

How HOT Society keeps discussions on track

Whether we realize it or not, when we try to make a point—or flat-out argue—we’re subconsciously trying to establish some very specific things. We're trying to establish what should be done, why, and how, and measure those objectives and actions against some rule or limit. The problem is, because we’re not consciously aware of that structure, we often do it poorly.


For example, people will argue endlessly about “equity” vs “equality” without realizing that, no matter the topic, the disagreement almost always comes down to the same root question:how each person defines those terms and which definition they think is correct. Everything else—scenarios, exceptions, hypotheticals—are just variations on that core conflict.HOT Society trims off the fat so we can focus on the root factors instead of getting lost in endless permutations.

  • School Funding: Should schools in lower-income areas get more funding (equity) or should all schools get the same funding per student (equality)?
  • Workplace Promotions: Should promotions be distributed based on identical performance metrics (equality) or adjusted to account for systemic disadvantages some employees face (equity)?
  • Healthcare Access: Should everyone get the same level of healthcare resources (equality) or should resources be allocated to match differing health needs and risks (equity)?

In each case, the surface arguments look different—but at their core, they all hinge on how participants define and prioritize “equity” and “equality.” HOT Society forces those core definitions into the open so the real disagreement is clear, cutting out distractions and keeping discussions on track.


We identify and organize arguments into baseline components—Ideas (what to do),Ideals (why it matters), Actions (how we do it), Principle Violations (rules/limits we might break), and Assertions (counters to those violation claims)—and keep discussions at those levels. The result: clearer, more relevant, more productive conversations.

The flow at a glance

Structured Discussions diagram: 4 columns × 5 rows mapping a sample argument to HOT Society’s structured flow
Structured Discussions — take what we're trying to do and making sure we're doing it correctly

HOT Values

Previously, we said we don’t need you to change anything. We lied. But since there are no principles in place yet—sorry, not sorry—we need you to be H.O.T.Honest, Objective, Transparent.


Guiding discussions can move conversations in the right direction, but being HOT is what makes them worth having in the first place. It’s the difference between “we talked” and “we got somewhere.”

  • Honest: say the raw, unvarnished truth—even when it’s uncomfortable.
  • Objective: judge ideas on their merit, not on the tribe, the vibe, or who said them.
  • Transparent: show your reasoning so others can test it, challenge it, and improve it.

Justina needs to know what Americans really want—not just the loudest voices or the cleverest spin. The truth matters, because without it, every vote, every principle, and every decision we make together risks being built on sand.